MSI H67A-G43 (MS-7750)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics53.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive28.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7750
MotherboardMSI H67A-G43 (MS-7750)  (all builds)
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '22 at 05:28
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$185
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 84.1
1-Core 98.7
2-Core 191
72% 125 Pts
4-Core 360
8-Core 457
52% 409 Pts
64-Core 461
28% 461 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53.1% Above average
Lighting 65.4
Reflection 67.5
Parallax 61.7
53% 64.9 fps
MRender 65
Gravity 67.1
Splatting 62.1
53% 64.7 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ortial SSD 128GB
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1130A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 22 23 40 49 32 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
28.5% Poor
Read 353
Write 65.4
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 32.7
27% 128 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 19.5
4K Mixed 1.2
40% 13.2 MB/s
DQ Read 24.2
DQ Write 41.9
DQ Mixed 1.2
10% 22.4 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 145%
Hitachi HDS721032CLA362 320GB-$150
218GB free
Firmware: JPFOA3BF
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 31 39 46 50 34 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
33.8% Below average
Read 78.3
Write 70.1
Mixed 40.1
SusWrite 39.4
42% 57 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMR5040MM58F9F1600 RMR5040MM58F9F1600 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
49.7% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 15.5
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 16.6
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H67A-G43 (MS-7750) Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI H67A-G43 (MS-7750)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $304
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback