Lenovo 2756CA6

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.22% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 2756CA6  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO MAHOBAY
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121015
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '22 at 16:34
Run Duration274 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2120-$75
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
58.7% Above average
Memory 81.1
1-Core 82
2-Core 135
61% 99.4 Pts
4-Core 213
8-Core 210
28% 212 Pts
64-Core 211
13% 211 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Gigabyte(1458 354E) 2GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.98
Relative performance (0th percentile)
8.22% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 26.9
Parallax 33.8
0% 20.3 fps
MRender 32.7
Gravity 30.3
Splatting 25.9
24% 29.6 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 8.22%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
215GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 49 51 67 62 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 95.5
Write 95
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 60.7
50% 68.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 107%
ADATA USB Flash Drive 124GB
116GB free, PID db8a,
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 4.4 15 4.2 16 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Read 32.5
Write 23.7
Mixed 27.7
SusWrite 11.9
31% 24 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 2.5
158% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 029E CMV4GX3M1A1600C11 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.6% Below average
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 10.6
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 12
SC Mixed 11.6
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 78.6
51% 78.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 2756CA6 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Lenovo 2756CA6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $245
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback