Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	16.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	25.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100 59,658 User benchmarks, average bench 42% LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	48.3% Average	Memory 70.8 1-Core 38.7 2-Core 78 41% 62.5 Pts	4-Core 152 8-Core 151 20% 152 Pts	64-Core 155 10% 155 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2200-$440 13,860 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Nvidia(10DE 1097) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	16.5% Very poor	Lighting 20.4 Reflection 17.3 Parallax 19.7 17% 19.1 fps	MRender 23.7 Gravity 22 Splatting 15.9 16% 20.5 fps
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 16.5% Great: 17%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk U100 64GB 381 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 16GB free (System drive) Firmware: 10.56.00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 88 48 42 54 39 MB/s Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	25.3% Poor	Read 217 Write 174 Mixed 90.2 SusWrite 66.3 30% 137 MB/s	4K Read 16.1 4K Write 11 4K Mixed 8.1 41% 11.7 MB/s	DQ Read 15.6 DQ Write 10.7 DQ Mixed 7 7% 11.1 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 25.3% Great: 46%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	19.7% Very poor	MC Read 7.1 MC Write 5.7 MC Mixed 5.7 18% 6.17 GB/s	SC Read 6.1 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 6 17% 5.93 GB/s	Latency 99.6 40% 99.6 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 19.7% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Jet ski

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	6x
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	3x
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	3x

GPU
GeForce GT 240NvidiaBench 4%, 11,020 samples	3x
GeForce GT 430NvidiaBench 3%, 22,369 samples	2x
Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples	2x

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $100

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16