PC NH5x_NH7xHP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics27.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive324% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemPC NH5x_NH7xHP  (all builds)
MotherboardCLEVO NHxxHP
Memory18.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210701
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '22 at 12:33
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
61.7% Good
Memory 49.3
1-Core 122
2-Core 249
72% 140 Pts
4-Core 400
8-Core 560
60% 480 Pts
64-Core 699
43% 699 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Clevo(1558 50E2) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1165
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.8% Poor
Lighting 30
Reflection 30
Parallax 48
24% 36 fps
MRender 14.7
Gravity 52.9
Splatting 51.8
34% 39.8 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 105%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 670p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$80
804GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1564 1651 1708 1784 658 969 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
324% Outstanding
Read 2,545
Write 1,940
Mixed 1,156
SusWrite 1,389
392% 1,758 MB/s
4K Read 73.3
4K Write 201
4K Mixed 90.8
334% 122 MB/s
DQ Read 854
DQ Write 690
DQ Mixed 568
481% 704 MB/s
Poor: 137%
This bench: 324%
Great: 383%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X16GE2400C16S4 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
76.1% Very good
MC Read 29.5
MC Write 30.6
MC Mixed 26.9
83% 29 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 30.3
SC Mixed 13
53% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 163
24% 163 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NH5x_NH7xHP Builds (Compare 36 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: PC NH5x_NH7xHP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 110% - Outstanding Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback