Fujitsu ESPRIMO C720

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive71.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemFujitsu ESPRIMO C720  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3224-A1
Memory15.9 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130916
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '22 at 11:23
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
69.5% Good
Memory 77.3
1-Core 102
2-Core 199
71% 126 Pts
4-Core 357
8-Core 362
48% 359 Pts
64-Core 356
22% 356 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Zotac(19DA 2476) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 511.65
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Lighting 18.1
Reflection 18.1
Parallax 18.6
15% 18.3 fps
MRender 15.9
Gravity 19
Splatting 16.9
14% 17.3 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Burst 240GB
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMJ1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 6.5 5.8 58 31 32 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Read 420
Write 416
Mixed 364
SusWrite 72.1
71% 318 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 67.5
4K Mixed 33.1
122% 43.3 MB/s
DQ Read 224
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 183
165% 245 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 94%
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$26
285GB free
Firmware: 0003SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 66 67 68 68 68 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 72.4
Write 63.4
Mixed 39.3
SusWrite 67.2
44% 60.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
104% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 M378B5273CH0-CK0 M378B5173QH0-CK0 1369 GKH800UD51208-1600 20GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.4% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 14.6
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 17.1
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 85.8
47% 85.8 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ESPRIMO C720 Builds (Compare 95 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO C720

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $114
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback