Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 43% Speed boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	53.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 M 560-$65 10,722 User benchmarks, average bench 41% None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	40.9% Average	Memory 53.3 1-Core 78.1 2-Core 133 51% 88.2 Pts	4-Core 165 8-Core 168 22% 166 Pts	64-Core 167 10% 167 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 215A) 3.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.4% Terrible	Lighting 0.4 Reflection 1.2 Parallax 0.5 0% 0.7 fps	MRender 1.1 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 0.5 1% 0.7 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.4% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 193GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 200 205 204 205 204 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	53.3% Above average	Read 215 Write 204 Mixed 201 SusWrite 204 46% 206 MB/s	4K Read 17.9 4K Write 33.6 4K Mixed 24.8 77% 25.4 MB/s	DQ Read 191 DQ Write 170 DQ Mixed 180 135% 180 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 53.3% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M471B5273DH0-CH9 80CE M471B5273CH0-CH9 8GB 402 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 1334, 1334 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	23.9% Poor	MC Read 7.7 MC Write 7 MC Mixed 10.2 24% 8.3 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 6.6 19% 6.6 GB/s	Latency 149 27% 149 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 23.9% Great: 50%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i5 M 560Intel $65Bench 41%, 10,722 samples	1x

GPU
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	1x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CH9 80CE M471B5273CH0-CH9 8GBUnknownBench 31%, 402 samples	1x

Value: 32% - Below average

Total price: $165

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16