Asus PRIME B450M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics44% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive192% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME B450M-K  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190930
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '22 at 09:56
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User MAR-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$145
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
74% Very good
Memory 74.2
1-Core 117
2-Core 217
76% 136 Pts
4-Core 397
8-Core 663
65% 530 Pts
64-Core 853
53% 853 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 74%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
PNY(196E 1327) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
44% Average
Lighting 57
Reflection 83.7
Parallax 51.1
46% 63.9 fps
MRender 43.4
Gravity 52.2
Splatting 47.7
39% 47.8 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 44%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar 1TB SSD 1TB
784GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.0.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1022 1146 1200 1257 1272 1344 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
192% Outstanding
Read 1,772
Write 731
Mixed 417
SusWrite 1,207
228% 1,032 MB/s
4K Read 49.3
4K Write 43.7
4K Mixed 29.1
135% 40.7 MB/s
DQ Read 244
DQ Write 91.4
DQ Mixed 55.1
70% 130 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 192%
Great: 271%
PNY CS900 240GB-$20
40GB free
Firmware: CS900613
SusWrite @10s intervals: 328 5.6 28 134 79 63 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
64.2% Good
Read 471
Write 302
Mixed 315
SusWrite 106
66% 299 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 37.7
4K Mixed 26.2
105% 32.7 MB/s
DQ Read 243
DQ Write 65.7
DQ Mixed 120
98% 143 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 91%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
323GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2 39 36 7.6 0.7 6.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 114
Write 107
Mixed 75.2
SusWrite 15.2
58% 77.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 Crucial BL8G30C15U4R.M8FE1 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
MC Read 32.9
MC Write 30.8
MC Mixed 28.1
87% 30.6 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 28.3
SC Mixed 25.1
71% 25 GB/s
Latency 92.1
43% 92.1 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME B450M-K Builds (Compare 3,765 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B450M-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $446
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback