TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Acer Predator PH315-54

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics8.62% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive354% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAcer Predator PH315-54  (all builds)
MotherboardTGL QX60_TLS
Memory21.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211126
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '22 at 06:39
Run Duration391 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Memory 78.7
1-Core 163
2-Core 322
100% 188 Pts
4-Core 555
8-Core 1,032
95% 793 Pts
64-Core 1,519
94% 1,519 Pts
Poor: 83% ↑
This bench: 91.2%
 Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 1534) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1273
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
8.62% Terrible
Lighting 9.9
Reflection 127
Parallax 11.9
8% 49.7 fps
MRender 12.8
Gravity 13.1
Splatting 10.3
10% 12.1 fps
Poor: 5% ↑
This bench: 8.62%
 Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00BT7 512GB
383GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7302Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1701 2797 908 913 906 924 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
354% Outstanding
Read 2,972
Write 3531
Mixed 2,749
SusWrite 1,358
597% 2,652 MB/s
4K Read 80.8
4K Write 179
4K Mixed 110
358% 123 MB/s
DQ Read 1,017
DQ Write 775
DQ Mixed 876
660% 889 MB/s
Poor: 193% ↑
This bench: 354%
 Great: 388%
Nvme WDC WDBA3V0020BNC-WRSN 2TB
941GB free
Firmware: 21705000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1818 1444 763 763 784 778 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
264% Outstanding
Read 1,749
Write 1,607
Mixed 1,648
SusWrite 1,058
341% 1,515 MB/s
4K Read 54.7
4K Write 196
4K Mixed 78
287% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1,068
DQ Write 810
DQ Mixed 907
687% 928 MB/s
Poor: 190% ↑
This bench: 264%
 Great: 291%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2666 C16 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
MC Read 34.1
MC Write 32
MC Mixed 26.8
88% 31 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 33.7
SC Mixed 19.1
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 83
48% 83 ns
Poor: 63% ↑
This bench: 84.4%
 Great: 87%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Predator PH315-54 Builds (Compare 3,729 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator PH315-54

CPU
Core i7-11800HIntelBench 88%, 56,029 samples3,300x
Core i9-11900HIntelBench 89%, 6,494 samples270x
Core i5-11400HIntelBench 80%, 35,470 samples159x
GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 7%, 53,008 samples1,895x
RTX 3060 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 90%, 102,706 samples1,155x
RTX 3070 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 114%, 45,297 samples444x
SSD
Micron_3400_MTFDKBA512TFH 512GBNvmeBench 331%, 3,976 samples727x
SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00BT7 512GBNvmeBench 288%, 830 samples696x
SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B07 512GBNvmeBench 303%, 1,542 samples565x
RAM
ACR32D4S2S1ME-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 59%, 2,645 samples1,075x
HMAA1GS6CJR6N-XN 2x8GBHynixBench 66%, 21,689 samples923x
M471A2K43EB1-CWE 1x16GBSamsungBench 46%, 7,758 samples279x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback