TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP Z400 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive36.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP Z400 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0B4Ch
Memory20.8 GB free of 24.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111102
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '22 at 02:22
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W3565
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Memory 64.1
1-Core 86.3
2-Core 167
60% 106 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 328
43% 321 Pts
64-Core 332
21% 332 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑
This bench: 59.4%
 Great: 74%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 320 Series 160GB-$149
113GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4PC10365
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 66 56 73 106 165 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 193
Write 164
Mixed 149
SusWrite 88.1
33% 149 MB/s
4K Read 14.1
4K Write 28.6
4K Mixed 17.5
59% 20.1 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 69.4
DQ Mixed 62.2
57% 89.8 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑
This bench: 36.1%
 Great: 51%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
830GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 70 59 83 97 128 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
70.2% Very good
Read 160
Write 125
Mixed 91.4
SusWrite 84.1
85% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
238% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑
This bench: 70.2%
 Great: 109%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
20GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.9 9.2 9.1 11 12 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
6.29% Terrible
Read 27.9
Write 8.8
Mixed 5.8
SusWrite 9
14% 12.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
4% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑
This bench: 6.29%
 Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:02 FE EBJ41EF8BCFA-DJ-F ID:02 FE EBJ41EF8BCFA-DJ-F ID:02 FE EBJ41EF8BCFA-DJ-F ID:02 FE EBJ41EF8BCFA-DJ-F ID:02 FE EBJ41EF8BCFA-DJ-F ID:02 FE EBJ41EF8BCFA-DJ-F 58GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
43.5% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 12.6
MC Mixed 17.2
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 11.7
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
Poor: 39% ↑
This bench: 43.5%
 Great: 54%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Z400 Workstation Builds (Compare 3,347 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z400 Workstation

CPU
Xeon W3520Intel  $230Bench 63%, 6,508 samples570x
Xeon W3550IntelBench 66%, 7,649 samples539x
Xeon W3565IntelBench 67%, 7,121 samples491x
GPU
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples276x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples157x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples138x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples136x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung  $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples74x
A400 480GBKingston  $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples66x
RAM
ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 42GBUnknownBench 37%, 128 samples22x
ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 46GBUnknownBench 45%, 108 samples18x
ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 46GBUnknownBench 46%, 280 samples17x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $258
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback