Today's hottest deals

MSI MAG B560 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7D15)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics58.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D15
MotherboardMSI MAG B560 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7D15)  (all builds)
Memory15.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210909
Uptime2 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '22 at 23:52
Run Duration222 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11700K-$230
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 91.4
1-Core 171
2-Core 340
108% 201 Pts
4-Core 635
8-Core 1,069
104% 852 Pts
64-Core 1,571
97% 1,571 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 105%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 590-$80
CLim: 1560 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.1.1
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
58.8% Above average
Lighting 75
Reflection 70.3
Parallax 104
61% 83.1 fps
MRender 71.7
Gravity 80.6
Splatting 52.5
54% 68.3 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WD_BLACK SN750 S 500GB
329GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 711130WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,131
Write 1,763
Mixed 1,586
337% 1,493 MB/s
4K Read 54.6
4K Write 292
4K Mixed 85.5
347% 144 MB/s
DQ Read 1,413
DQ Write 1,068
DQ Mixed 1,195
906% 1,225 MB/s
Poor: 111% Great: 305%
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB
303GB free
Firmware: 415020WD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 368
Write 429
Mixed 370
87% 389 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 41.7
149% 56.8 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 163
170% 281 MB/s
Poor: 65% Great: 117%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
597GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 129
Write 49.7
Mixed 69.1
62% 82.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
597GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 103
Write 103
Mixed 75.1
70% 93.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
184% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 101%
WDC WD20 EARS-22MVWB0 2TB
184GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 37
Write 32.4
Mixed 27.1
40% 32.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 19%
WD My Book 25EE 8TB
4.5TB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 195
Write 200
Mixed 123
216% 173 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.1
212% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 20% Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL16G32C16U4BL.16FE 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 37.7
MC Write 38
MC Mixed 35.3
106% 37 GB/s
SC Read 24.1
SC Write 35.2
SC Mixed 30.2
85% 29.8 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 102%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAG B560 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7D15) Builds (Compare 3,240 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI MAG B560 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7D15)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $543
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $273WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback