Intel SHARKBAY

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.94% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive44.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardIntel SHARKBAY  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150721
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '22 at 16:40
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User AZE-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690-$51
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Memory 82.8
1-Core 106
2-Core 212
76% 134 Pts
4-Core 420
8-Core 414
56% 417 Pts
64-Core 419
26% 419 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7750
MSI(1462 2794) 2GB
CLim: 800 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.5.1
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
6.94% Terrible
Lighting 8.4
Reflection 12.4
Parallax 14.1
7% 11.6 fps
MRender 7.6
Gravity 9.6
Splatting 8.8
7% 8.67 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.94%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SUV400S37 120GB
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0430A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 62 62 59 57 60 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
44.2% Average
Read 437
Write 359
Mixed 143
SusWrite 79.6
56% 254 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 27.7
4K Mixed 6.6
73% 22.4 MB/s
DQ Read 26.3
DQ Write 45.6
DQ Mixed 7.3
14% 26.4 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 70%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
392GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 181 174 177 182 180 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
99% Outstanding
Read 167
Write 150
Mixed 35
SusWrite 178
96% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.5
130% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 99%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99P5474-055.A00LF 1315 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.7% Average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 13.8
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 14.5
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 75.4
53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SHARKBAY Builds (Compare 301 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel SHARKBAY

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $142
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $64
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback