Intel P55/H55

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics41.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardIntel P55/H55  (all builds)
Memory7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180208
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '22 at 13:01
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 46%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X3470
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Memory 78.4
1-Core 63
2-Core 109
53% 83.5 Pts
4-Core 176
8-Core 261
27% 218 Pts
64-Core 286
18% 286 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126
CLim: 1296 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.2.1
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.3% Average
Lighting 49.6
Reflection 60.5
Parallax 73.2
40% 61.1 fps
MRender 60.5
Gravity 56.5
Splatting 44.5
43% 53.8 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 47%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS350 512GB
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AP613PE0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 152 127 122 114 73 MB/s
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53.3% Above average
Read 240
Write 190
Mixed 204
SusWrite 122
42% 189 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 45.2
4K Mixed 24.7
91% 31 MB/s
DQ Read 181
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 149
122% 174 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
0, 0 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
39.7% Below average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 12.7
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 10.8
28% 9.9 GB/s
Latency 83.6
48% 83.6 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P55/H55 Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel P55/H55

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $217
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback