Dell System Vostro 3460

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemDell System Vostro 3460  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0WCY8Y
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130517
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '22 at 08:29
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3632QM
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
64.7% Good
Memory 85.3
1-Core 72.8
2-Core 149
62% 102 Pts
4-Core 240
8-Core 372
38% 306 Pts
64-Core 403
25% 403 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630M
Dell(1028 0563) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.3165
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
3.69% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 6.6
Parallax 2.6
4% 4.53 fps
MRender 6.3
Gravity 4.6
Splatting 3.8
4% 4.9 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.69%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron C400 RealSSD 256GB
164GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 04TH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 65 63 90 89 102 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 410
Write 249
Mixed 224
SusWrite 99.5
54% 246 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 66.9
4K Mixed 10.1
79% 32.5 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 23.2
42% 81.7 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173CB0-YK0 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
53% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 16.8
53% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 15
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 53%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical System Vostro 3460 Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Dell System Vostro 3460

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback