Advent Centurion CPD1301

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	41.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Advent Centurion CPD1301 (all builds)
Motherboard	FOXCONN A7VMX-K
Memory	5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.4 GHz
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20091215
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 17 '17 at 09:19
Run Duration	298 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X2 545 1,088 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Socket 940, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	31.4% Below average	Memory 53.6 1-Core 30.4 2-Core 42.6 30% 42.2 Pts	4-Core 52.3 8-Core 79.3 8% 65.8 Pts	64-Core 75.5 5% 75.5 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 51%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109 51,792 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 72GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT0AB0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2379 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1175 (B1) Unknown 96 96 39 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 61 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 7 (EB) Unknown 99 99 64 (F1) Unknown 99 99 6896204840	41.4% Average	Read 250 Write 121 Mixed 163 39% 178 MB/s	4K Read 21.9 4K Write 57 4K Mixed 8.37 74% 29.1 MB/s	DQ Read 21.2 DQ Write 115 DQ Mixed 8.32 24% 48 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 73%
Hitachi HDE721010SLA330 1TB-$84 9,234 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 931GB free Firmware: ST6OA3AA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 132 132 114 (03) Spinup time 120 120 38685835740 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 38 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 1 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 123 123 34 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 37559 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 38 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 264 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 264 (C2) HDA temperature 206 206 236224512029 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 1 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	60.8% Good	Read 106 Write 105 Mixed 106 80% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.86 4K Mixed 0.55 128% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 60.8% Great: 63%
TOSHIBA USB FLASH DRIVE 16GB 822 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 7GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	5.01% Terrible	Read 23.9 Write 4.14 Mixed 5.84 11% 11.3 MB/s	4K Read 2.66 4K Write 0.004 4K Mixed 0.003 10% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.01% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	23.2% Poor	MC Read 9.1 MC Write 7.3 MC Mixed 8.3 24% 8.23 GB/s	SC Read 4.9 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 7.2 16% 5.57 GB/s	Latency 148 27% 148 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 23.2% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Advent Centurion CPD1301

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)