Tarox Basic 5000HM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics56.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive118% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemTarox Basic 5000HM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME H310M-A R2.0
Memory28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180817
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '22 at 07:23
Run Duration217 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 67%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
55.2% Above average
Memory 35
1-Core 114
2-Core 195
60% 114 Pts
4-Core 403
8-Core 608
63% 505 Pts
64-Core 698
43% 698 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
HP(103C 8439) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.7% Above average
Lighting 70.3
Reflection 73.5
Parallax 67.7
57% 70.5 fps
MRender 67.6
Gravity 70.2
Splatting 65.9
55% 67.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$88
690GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P3CR013 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 318 320 326 326 324 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 365
Write 332
Mixed 322
SusWrite 323
76% 336 MB/s
4K Read 51.5
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 66.1
220% 75.1 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 299
DQ Mixed 266
218% 313 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 118%
Great: 295%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$77
737GB free
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 731 731 733 746 749 744 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
183% Outstanding
Read 738
Write 700
Mixed 710
SusWrite 739
163% 722 MB/s
4K Read 47.8
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 68.2
232% 84.3 MB/s
DQ Read 843
DQ Write 778
DQ Mixed 1,306
844% 976 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 183%
Great: 347%
Sandisk S3 2T00 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 415020RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 317 313 320 324 326 325 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Read 398
Write 301
Mixed 350
SusWrite 321
77% 342 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 90.8
4K Mixed 41.6
159% 56.9 MB/s
DQ Read 346
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 236
202% 297 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 118%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 16GB-$7
13GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 14 13 14 13 13 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
30.9% Below average
Read 139
Write 32.2
Mixed 51.7
SusWrite 13.1
62% 59.1 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.7
152% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
65% Good
MC Read 25.4
MC Write 26.5
MC Mixed 20.8
69% 24.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 25.3
SC Mixed 18.6
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 227
18% 227 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 65%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Basic 5000HM Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski

System: Tarox Basic 5000HM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $231
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback