HP HPE-510nl

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Gunboat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	HP HPE-510nl (all builds)
Motherboard	PEGATRON 2AB6
Memory	5.2 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110411
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 11 '22 at 06:36
Run Duration	179 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	33%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$201 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	66.4% Good	Memory 84.8 1-Core 83.8 2-Core 145 64% 104 Pts	4-Core 260 8-Core 459 43% 360 Pts	64-Core 460 28% 460 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 66.4% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 420 9,903 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Device(1B0A 9083) 2GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.73 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	1.68% Terrible	Lighting 1.9 Reflection 3.4 Parallax 0.3 2% 1.87 fps	MRender 3.1 Gravity 2.2 Splatting 2 2% 2.43 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.68% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2016) 20,831 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 28GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z3311000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 19 48 34 13 38 MB/s Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	45.8% Average	Read 278 Write 98.3 Mixed 125 SusWrite 40.7 30% 135 MB/s	4K Read 5.9 4K Write 80.1 4K Mixed 20.3 77% 35.4 MB/s	DQ Read 163 DQ Write 216 DQ Mixed 20.5 63% 133 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 45.8% Great: 70%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$71 17,356 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1.5TB free Firmware: JKAOA3GB SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 102 101 101 102 102 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	58.3% Above average	Read 101 Write 98.8 Mixed 58.2 SusWrite 102 66% 90 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 58.3% Great: 69%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB 4,649 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 11GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.6 2.8 1.9 1.2 7.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	11.8% Very poor	Read 32.5 Write 13.2 Mixed 13.5 SusWrite 2.9 17% 15.5 MB/s	4K Read 4.1 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 100% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 11.8% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 Corsair CMV4GX3M1A1333C9 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 10GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	48.2% Average	MC Read 17.2 MC Write 17.1 MC Mixed 15.3 47% 16.5 GB/s	SC Read 12.9 SC Write 16.1 SC Mixed 13.7 41% 14.2 GB/s	Latency 72.2 55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical HPE-510nl Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: HP HPE-510nl

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $201Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	3x

GPU
GeForce GT 420NvidiaBench 2%, 9,903 samples	3x

SSD
Green 240GB (2016)WDBench 53%, 20,831 samples	2x

RAM
8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 Corsair CMV4GX3M1A1333C9 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 10GBMicronBench 42%, 3 samples	2x
CMX16GX3M4A1333C9 Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 10GBCorsairBench 43%, 1 sample	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $201

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16