Medion E7415 MD60013

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMedion E7415 MD60013  (all builds)
MotherboardMedion D17DUN
Memory2.5 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150626
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 10 '22 at 18:05
Run Duration266 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-5005U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Memory 83.6
1-Core 64
2-Core 128
57% 91.7 Pts
4-Core 162
8-Core 168
22% 165 Pts
64-Core 168
10% 168 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Device(1B0A 2244) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4642
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
3.63% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 5.8
3% 4.17 fps
MRender 5.8
Gravity 4.2
Splatting 5.3
4% 5.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.63%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 2.5" PHISON 128GB PS3110-S10C
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 57 82 87 61 49 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40% Below average
Read 213
Write 205
Mixed 197
SusWrite 76.4
39% 173 MB/s
4K Read 15.9
4K Write 41.5
4K Mixed 27
81% 28.1 MB/s
DQ Read 14.6
DQ Write 34.4
DQ Mixed 87.9
49% 45.6 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 40%
Great: 86%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$55
912GB free
Firmware: AX1P1A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 116 115 114 111 113 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
65.7% Good
Read 115
Write 101
Mixed 35.9
SusWrite 114
66% 91.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
121% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT425S6CFR6A-PB HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
44.7% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 14
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 13.2
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical E7415 MD60013 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Medion E7415 MD60013

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback