PC X299 AORUS Gaming 3-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 53% Yacht	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 51% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	70.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	PC X299 AORUS Gaming 3-CF (all builds)
Motherboard	Gigabyte X299 AORUS Gaming 3-CF
Memory	23.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171228
Uptime	26.6 Days
Run Date	Feb 10 '22 at 10:14
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	12%

Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7800X-$206 22,334 User benchmarks, average bench 78% CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	73.9% Very good	Memory 62.8 1-Core 126 2-Core 240 77% 143 Pts	4-Core 455 8-Core 758 74% 607 Pts	64-Core 928 57% 928 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 73.9% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195 428,800 User benchmarks, average bench 71% Gigabyte(1458 4013) CLim: 2235 MHz, MLim: 3700 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 497.09 Performing below potential (52^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	70.6% Very good	Lighting 87.5 Reflection 129 Parallax 82.6 71% 99.6 fps	MRender 113 Gravity 76.6 Splatting 70.9 69% 87 fps
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 70.6% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 94GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 165 158 172 160 152 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 455 Write 418 Mixed 380 SusWrite 188 81% 360 MB/s	4K Read 40.6 4K Write 109 4K Mixed 54 188% 67.8 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 336 DQ Mixed 356 268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 572GB free Firmware: CC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 177 179 179 180 179 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	88.1% Excellent	Read 129 Write 106 Mixed 71.6 SusWrite 178 89% 121 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 146% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 88.1% Great: 112%
Amd-raid WDC WDS500G2B0C- 500GB 175 User benchmarks, average bench 149% 87GB free Firmware: 211070WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 49 50 52 52 53 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 55% Great: 249%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x8GB 41,916 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2932 MHz Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	44.6% Average	MC Read 13.4 MC Write 21.4 MC Mixed 13 46% 15.9 GB/s	SC Read 8 SC Write 20.6 SC Mixed 10.1 37% 12.9 GB/s	Latency 120 33% 120 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 44.6% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X299 AORUS Gaming 3-CF Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 102%

UFO

Desktop 84%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 103%

UFO

System: PC X299 AORUS Gaming 3-CF

CPU
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	3x
Core i7-7800XIntel $206Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	4x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	1x

SSD
SSDNow UV400 480GBKingston $175Bench 73%, 24,007 samples	1x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	1x
850 Evo 2TBSamsung $265Bench 112%, 8,527 samples	1x

RAM
4x16GBUnknownBench 98%, 9,153 samples	4x
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $1,035

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16