Acer Swift SFX14-41G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics49.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive230% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Swift SFX14-41G  (all builds)
MotherboardCZ Orion_CA
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210806
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateFeb 10 '22 at 09:52
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
Memory 69.1
1-Core 160
2-Core 317
95% 182 Pts
4-Core 633
8-Core 1,139
106% 886 Pts
64-Core 1,242
77% 1,242 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-Ti (Laptop)
Acer(1025 1536) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.40.52
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.9% Average
Lighting 63.4
Reflection 67
Parallax 58.2
52% 62.9 fps
MRender 66.6
Gravity 52.6
Splatting 53.1
46% 57.4 fps
Poor: 42%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 72%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00-1114 1TB
903GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21113000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1386 830 820 834 867 832 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
230% Outstanding
Read 1,570
Write 1,791
Mixed 1,389
SusWrite 928
320% 1,419 MB/s
4K Read 45.7
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 66.1
215% 75.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,122
DQ Write 847
DQ Mixed 1,044
764% 1,004 MB/s
Poor: 140%
This bench: 230%
Great: 260%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown K4UBE3D4AA-MGCR 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB LPDDR4 clocked @ 4266 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
MC Read 33
MC Write 30
MC Mixed 29
88% 30.7 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 38.9
SC Mixed 29.5
86% 30.2 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Swift SFX14-41G Builds (Compare 453 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Acer Swift SFX14-41G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback