TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus PRIME H270-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics29.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive269% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME H270-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180511
Uptime28 Days
Run DateFeb 10 '22 at 03:18
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600K-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Memory 92.8
1-Core 125
2-Core 251
88% 156 Pts
4-Core 497
8-Core 481
66% 489 Pts
64-Core 498
31% 498 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑
This bench: 89.2%
 Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
MSI(1462 8C96)
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 496.76
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.9% Poor
Lighting 38.1
Reflection 48.3
Parallax 38.5
31% 41.6 fps
MRender 36.9
Gravity 38.6
Splatting 28.4
28% 34.6 fps
Poor: 27% ↑
This bench: 29.9%
 Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
149GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 696 382 386 395 388 387 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
269% Outstanding
Read 2,561
Write 2215
Mixed 1,595
SusWrite 439
379% 1,702 MB/s
4K Read 67.5
4K Write 163
4K Mixed 91.1
305% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 1,011
DQ Write 1,001
DQ Mixed 1,137
818% 1,050 MB/s
Poor: 152% ↑
This bench: 269%
 Great: 302%
H10 HBRPEKNX0101A NVMe INTEL 256GB
34GB free
Firmware: 7002 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 56 29 30 29 30 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 790
Write 458
Mixed 490
SusWrite 61.7
99% 450 MB/s
4K Read 51.9
4K Write 159
4K Mixed 69.3
251% 93.3 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 456
DQ Mixed 212
191% 279 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑
This bench: 127%
 Great: 153%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 139 140 140 143 142 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Read 155
Write 150
Mixed 81.4
SusWrite 140
96% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
203% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑
This bench: 84.7%
 Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD BLS8G4D240FSA.M16FAD 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
MC Read 29.5
MC Write 32.8
MC Mixed 28.7
87% 30.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 33.7
SC Mixed 26.3
74% 25.9 GB/s
Latency 62.5
64% 62.5 ns
Poor: 78% ↑
This bench: 85.5%
 Great: 86%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical PRIME H270-PLUS Builds (Compare 2,856 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H270-PLUS - $3,094

CPU
Core i7-7700Intel  $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples1,380x
Core i5-7500Intel  $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples218x
Core i7-7700KIntel  $249Bench 84%, 712,312 samples215x
GPU
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia  $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples490x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples205x
GTX 1070Nvidia  $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples187x
SSD
Green 120GB (2016)WD  $84Bench 53%, 21,990 samples123x
Ultimate SU800 128GBAdata  $30Bench 77%, 32,167 samples64x
Premier SP550 120GBAdata  $45Bench 76%, 22,057 samples52x
RAM
DDR4 2400 2OZ 2x8GBAdataBench 76%, 26,065 samples552x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples128x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples47x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $3,464
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback