Acer Aspire V3-772

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire V3-772  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer VA70_HW
Memory3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130719
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '22 at 15:42
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4702MQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 89.4
2-Core 168
67% 114 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 443
47% 378 Pts
64-Core 446
28% 446 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Acer(1025 0781) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.15.4248
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
3.28% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 8.5
Parallax 6.8
3% 6.3 fps
MRender 7.4
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.9
4% 4.9 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.28%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 507KC4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 136 139 140 144 146 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 319
Write 194
Mixed 221
SusWrite 142
49% 219 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 51.9
4K Mixed 29.9
99% 34.5 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 169
DQ Mixed 130
114% 172 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 87%
Toshiba MQ01ABD075 750GB-$40
515GB free
Firmware: AX003J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 69 68 69 69 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
38% Below average
Read 63.7
Write 68.6
Mixed 32.4
SusWrite 68.6
43% 58.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
107% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 38%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 Kingston ACR16D3LS1NGG/2G 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
55.6% Above average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 16.6
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 17.7
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire V3-772 Builds (Compare 415 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire V3-772

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 4% - Terrible Total price: $119
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback