Lenovo 30BAS1FD00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 113%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics134% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive273% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 30BAS1FD00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 1037
Memory58.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '22 at 06:02
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Gold 6230
CPU0, 1 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
70% Good
Memory 78.2
1-Core 102
2-Core 171
69% 117 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 655
58% 493 Pts
64-Core 2,025
125% 2,025 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 70%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
MSI(1462 C72C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
134% Outstanding
Lighting 182
Reflection 174
Parallax 180
148% 179 fps
MRender 197
Gravity 160
Splatting 131
130% 163 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 134%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB1T0HBLR-000L7 1TB
802GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4M2QEXF7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1658 1638 1542 1436 1448 1438 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
273% Outstanding
Read 1,919
Write 1,872
Mixed 1,502
SusWrite 1,527
384% 1,705 MB/s
4K Read 45.7
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 64.3
224% 82.5 MB/s
DQ Read 909
DQ Write 587
DQ Mixed 726
547% 741 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 273%
Great: 380%
Seagate ST4000NM000A 00MX141 00MX141LEN 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: LJB8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 220 224 223 227 222 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A4K40CB2-CVF 2x31.5GB
2 of 12 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
62.3% Good
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 30.6
MC Mixed 20.2
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 20.6
SC Mixed 9.2
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 84
48% 84 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 30BAS1FD00 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO

System: Lenovo 30BAS1FD00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $466
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback