Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	48.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	67.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140407
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 09 '22 at 04:37
Run Duration	154 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-9370-$194 9,054 User benchmarks, average bench 62% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.8 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	72.9% Very good	Memory 89.5 1-Core 84.3 2-Core 170 68% 115 Pts	4-Core 305 8-Core 495 49% 400 Pts	64-Core 494 31% 494 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 72.9% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% ASRock(1849 5030) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1370 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.2.1 Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	48.3% Average	Lighting 59.8 Reflection 64 Parallax 84.8 49% 69.5 fps	MRender 63.9 Gravity 67 Splatting 47.4 47% 59.4 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Team T253LE120G 120GB 3,175 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 77GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 273 225 63 63 64 63 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	67.1% Good	Read 362 Write 268 Mixed 267 SusWrite 125 57% 255 MB/s	4K Read 30.6 4K Write 68.3 4K Mixed 27.7 118% 42.2 MB/s	DQ Read 219 DQ Write 200 DQ Mixed 147 127% 189 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 67.1% Great: 85%
Clover CN-M750MBB 750GB 81 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 150GB free Firmware: 2BA30001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 27 41 36 24 28 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	28.5% Poor	Read 67.9 Write 10.5 Mixed 26.7 SusWrite 31.2 25% 34.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 104% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 28.5% Great: 59%
Seagate Backup+ Desktop 4TB 834 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 4GB free Firmware: 1404 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 273 Write 128 Mixed 216 155% 205 MB/s	4K Read 4 4K Write 4 4K Mixed 3.1 585% 3.7 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 101%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown KRE-D3U1600M/4G Kingston 9905403-547.A00LF SH564128FH8N0QNSCR 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	40.6% Average	MC Read 15.3 MC Write 14.4 MC Mixed 11.9 40% 13.9 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 11 30% 10.3 GB/s	Latency 67.9 59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 40.6% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,065 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	565x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	138x
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	80x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	67x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	62x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	59x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	41x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	40x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	33x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	37x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	24x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $606

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16