HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1495
Memory11.4 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190412
Uptime5.5 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '22 at 03:17
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Memory 82.6
1-Core 94.7
2-Core 184
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 343
8-Core 345
46% 344 Pts
64-Core 350
22% 350 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Gigabyte(1458 375C) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
13% Very poor
Lighting 16.4
Reflection 15.1
Parallax 15.7
13% 15.7 fps
MRender 13
Gravity 16.6
Splatting 15.4
12% 15 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
368GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR041
SusWrite @10s intervals: 546 239 83 154 113 113 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 35% Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 176 174 177 177 176 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$45
635GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 29 29 30 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Read 30.4
Write 25.9
Mixed 21.9
SusWrite 29.3
20% 26.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 TIMETEC-UD3-1333 M378B5773DH0-CH9 TIMETEC-UD3-1333 20GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 8192, 2048, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
49.1% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 15.8
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 14.9
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 75.9
53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC Builds (Compare 3,278 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $278
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback