Gigabyte GA-EP43T-UD3L

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-EP43T-UD3L  (all builds)
Memory2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090724
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '22 at 20:43
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E7500-$109
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
41.1% Average
Memory 72.6
1-Core 35.2
2-Core 57.1
39% 55 Pts
4-Core 59.8
8-Core 61.1
8% 60.4 Pts
64-Core 71.3
4% 71.3 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9500 GT
Gigabyte(1458 34A9) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
2.24% Terrible
Lighting 2.5
Reflection 4.2
Parallax 1.1
2% 2.6 fps
MRender 3.5
Gravity 1.6
Splatting 4.2
3% 3.1 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.24%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
108GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 89 44 44 32 31 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
43.1% Average
Read 103
Write 60.6
Mixed 34.5
SusWrite 47
45% 61.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.8
116% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 70%
ST1000LM 024 HN-M101MBB 1TB
2GB free, PID 0569
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 20 20 20 19 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Read 31.2
Write 29.7
Mixed 24.6
SusWrite 20
35% 26.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.4
45% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 36%
PHD 3.0 Silicon-Power 1TB
102GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 19 20 19 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Read 27.7
Write 27.6
Mixed 21
SusWrite 19.8
32% 24 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
76% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.8% Very poor
MC Read 5.7
MC Write 5.2
MC Mixed 5.3
15% 5.4 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 5.5
15% 5.3 GB/s
Latency 95.6
42% 95.6 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-EP43T-UD3L Builds (Compare 97 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EP43T-UD3L

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $229
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback