Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JB_R521JB

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (95th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 5 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	6.52% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	221% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 83% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JB_R521JB (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X509JB
Memory	8.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200611
Uptime	1.8 Days
Run Date	Feb 08 '22 at 19:45
Run Duration	202 Seconds
Run User	IRN-User
Background CPU	2%
CPU Throttled	83%

PC Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-1035G1 53,170 User benchmarks, average bench 51% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	76.8% Very good	Memory 77.4 1-Core 125 2-Core 244 82% 149 Pts	4-Core 426 8-Core 510 61% 468 Pts	64-Core 495 31% 495 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 76.8% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia MX110 6,322 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Asus(1043 183F) 2GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6259 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	6.52% Terrible	Lighting 7.4 Reflection 10.4 Parallax 7.6 6% 8.47 fps	MRender 11.7 Gravity 8.2 Splatting 8.1 8% 9.33 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.52% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ512HBLU-00B00 512GB 12,842 User benchmarks, average bench 166% 428GB free (System drive) Firmware: FXM7201Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 1611 1642 1118 308 233 357 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	221% Outstanding	Read 1,370 Write 1,353 Mixed 1,205 SusWrite 878 270% 1,202 MB/s	4K Read 50.1 4K Write 116 4K Mixed 67.4 223% 77.7 MB/s	DQ Read 1,071 DQ Write 872 DQ Mixed 935 710% 959 MB/s
Poor: 104% ↑ This bench: 221% Great: 236%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB 452,134 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 911GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 126 134 134 130 123 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	70.8% Very good	Read 119 Write 112 Mixed 67.9 SusWrite 128 78% 107 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 189% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 70.8% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 859B CB8GS2666.C8PT 12GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2667, 2667 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	62.2% Good	MC Read 25 MC Write 23.1 MC Mixed 17.5 62% 21.9 GB/s	SC Read 17.4 SC Write 23.7 SC Mixed 18.4 57% 19.8 GB/s	Latency 85.6 47% 85.6 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 62.2% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JB_R521JB Builds (Compare 65 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JB_R521JB

CPU
Core i3-1005G1IntelBench 44%, 22,960 samples	25x
Core i5-1035G1IntelBench 51%, 53,170 samples	24x
Core i7-1065G7IntelBench 53%, 58,314 samples	16x

GPU
UHD G1IntelBench 5%, 68,603 samples	38x
MX110NvidiaBench 6%, 6,322 samples	14x
Iris Plus G7IntelBench 9%, 52,498 samples	13x

SSD
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBBench 121%, 26,870 samples	3x
WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GBWDCBench 45%, 85,321 samples	3x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBIntel $70Bench 191%, 163,917 samples	2x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CTD Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 8GBSamsungBench 58%, 6,259 samples	24x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GBSamsungBench 60%, 54,777 samples	13x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16