Quanta TW9/SW9

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	25.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 95% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Quanta TW9/SW9 (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel Base Board Product Name
Memory	1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20100906
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Feb 08 '22 at 17:38
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	24%
CPU Throttled	95%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 Q 740-$190 13,278 User benchmarks, average bench 54% CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.75 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	38.2% Below average	Memory 57 1-Core 37.1 2-Core 68.8 35% 54.3 Pts	4-Core 106 8-Core 165 17% 136 Pts	64-Core 168 10% 168 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 38.2% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 425M 3,013 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Quanta(152D 0852) 1GB CLim: 560 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	2.65% Terrible	Lighting 3.1 Reflection 5.9 Parallax 1.9 2% 3.63 fps	MRender 5 Gravity 3.5 Splatting 2.6 3% 3.7 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.65% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120GB 16,974 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 44GB free (System drive) Firmware: UE5100RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 30 10 34 77 49 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	25.5% Poor	Read 214 Write 166 Mixed 61.8 SusWrite 62.3 28% 126 MB/s	4K Read 9.9 4K Write 11.6 4K Mixed 11.2 36% 10.9 MB/s	DQ Read 36.4 DQ Write 53.7 DQ Mixed 32.4 28% 40.8 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 25.5% Great: 55%
Toshiba MK7559GSXP 80 750GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 600GB free Firmware: JJ4OE4OC SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 35 29 34 35 35 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	32.4% Below average	Read 79.3 Write 39.8 Mixed 31.3 SusWrite 33.6 34% 46 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.6 106% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 32.4% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya M2S2G64CB88B5N-BE 2x2GB 97 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	25.8% Poor	MC Read 10.2 MC Write 8.8 MC Mixed 7.8 26% 8.93 GB/s	SC Read 6.7 SC Write 7.5 SC Mixed 7.6 21% 7.27 GB/s	Latency 137 29% 137 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 25.8% Great: 40%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TW9/SW9 Builds (Compare 116 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

System: Quanta TW9/SW9

CPU
Core i7 Q 740Intel $190Bench 54%, 13,278 samples	39x
Core i7 Q 720Intel $220Bench 51%, 13,149 samples	28x
Core i5 M 450IntelBench 40%, 8,084 samples	10x

GPU
GeForce GT 335MNvidiaBench 3%, 977 samples	63x
GeForce GT 425MNvidiaBench 3%, 3,013 samples	23x
GeForce GT 240MNvidiaBench 2%, 2,359 samples	13x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
JD120 120GBJamesdonkeyBench 62%, 1,575 samples	4x
MX100 512GBCrucial $200Bench 88%, 31,545 samples	3x

RAM
M2S4G64CB8HB5N-BE M2S2G64CB88B5N-BE 6GBUnknownBench 29%, 27 samples	6x
M2N2G64CB8HC5N-CG 2x2GBNanyaBench 29%, 46 samples	5x
GMB20028SOX8271066 4GBUnknownBench 36%, 7 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $218

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16