Acer AL 5100 / VL410

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAcer AL 5100 / VL410  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer FRS690L
Memory0.8 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20081202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '22 at 15:04
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 3800+-$84
Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
27.9% Poor
Memory 46.2
1-Core 30.7
2-Core 59.4
29% 45.4 Pts
4-Core 58.4
8-Core 59.4
8% 58.9 Pts
64-Core 60.3
4% 60.3 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 43%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$105
0GB free
Firmware: 10.01E03
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 58.1
Write 58.2
Mixed 43.6
40% 53.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
192% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 33%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 32GB
1GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.5 0.7 0.7 0.6 1.2 5.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
4.79% Terrible
Read 24.9
Write 7.4
Mixed 11
SusWrite 1.5
12% 11.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
13% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.79%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
1024, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
13% Very poor
MC Read 4.2
MC Write 4.3
MC Mixed 3.8
12% 4.1 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 3.8
12% 4.33 GB/s
Latency 176
23% 176 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback