AMD Annapurna CRB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAMD Annapurna CRB  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190716
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '22 at 13:46
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-4555M APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
30.5% Below average
Memory 49
1-Core 27.1
2-Core 43.6
27% 39.9 Pts
4-Core 70.2
8-Core 79.5
10% 74.8 Pts
64-Core 68.7
4% 68.7 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
MSI(1462 8C93) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.49% Terrible
Lighting 4.2
Reflection 3.2
Parallax 4.3
3% 3.9 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 4
Splatting 5
4% 4.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.49%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Suneast SE800 256GB
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1127B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 154 93 16 97 87 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
42.4% Average
Read 374
Write 314
Mixed 321
SusWrite 111
63% 280 MB/s
4K Read 16.5
4K Write 22.5
4K Mixed 11.9
52% 17 MB/s
DQ Read 133
DQ Write 93
DQ Mixed 40.3
50% 88.8 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G3N169ES4.16FE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
16.1% Very poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 3
MC Mixed 5.4
15% 5.3 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 6.2
14% 4.97 GB/s
Latency 164
24% 164 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Annapurna CRB Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: AMD Annapurna CRB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback