Zoostorm 7200-5246A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics7.03% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive62.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemZoostorm 7200-5246A  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI A68HM-E33 V2 (MS-7721)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160614
Uptime4.7 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '22 at 12:24
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7860K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$175
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
43.7% Average
Memory 56.3
1-Core 68.4
2-Core 123
48% 82.5 Pts
4-Core 178
8-Core 193
24% 186 Pts
64-Core 195
12% 195 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
MSI(1462 7721) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
7.03% Terrible
Lighting 8.8
Reflection 8.7
Parallax 12.7
7% 10.1 fps
MRender 6.8
Gravity 9.8
Splatting 8.1
7% 8.23 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.03%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Netac 240GB 240GB
125GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW200326
SusWrite @10s intervals: 283 335 341 336 346 340 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 444
Write 358
Mixed 308
SusWrite 330
81% 360 MB/s
4K Read 11.9
4K Write 64.6
4K Mixed 7.8
62% 28.1 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 16.2
51% 108 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 93%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
333GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 69 71 71 71 71 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
37.8% Below average
Read 61.5
Write 65.6
Mixed 64.2
SusWrite 70.1
49% 65.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 67%
Seagate ST2000VM003-1CT164 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: SC23
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 129 127 127 128 128 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Read 120
Write 122
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 128
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
114% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BD160B.M16 CT102464BD160B.M16 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
36.2% Below average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 15.4
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 11.4
26% 9.13 GB/s
Latency 139
29% 139 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 7200-5246A Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Zoostorm 7200-5246A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $175
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback