Asus TUF GAMING B460-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 97% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 99% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING B460-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210709
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 08 '22 at 12:05
Run Duration	221 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10700K-$224 198,859 User benchmarks, average bench 97% LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	94.9% Outstanding	Memory 94.6 1-Core 144 2-Core 271 95% 170 Pts	4-Core 511 8-Core 968 88% 740 Pts	64-Core 1,546 96% 1,546 Pts
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 94.9% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510 319,148 User benchmarks, average bench 100% MSI(1462 C752) CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.65 Performing below potential (62^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	101% Outstanding	Lighting 120 Reflection 111 Parallax 1.9 98% 77.9 fps	MRender 181 Gravity 112 Splatting 106 106% 133 fps
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 106%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial P5 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69 17,082 User benchmarks, average bench 256% 34GB free (System drive) Firmware: P4CR313 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,659 Write 2,264 Mixed 1642 486% 2,188 MB/s	4K Read 53.1 4K Write 121 4K Mixed 68 232% 80.8 MB/s	DQ Read 986 DQ Write 694 DQ Mixed 848 631% 843 MB/s
Poor: 168% Great: 332%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 109GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 419 303 304 287 259 246 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	118% Outstanding	Read 502 Write 487 Mixed 408 SusWrite 303 95% 425 MB/s	4K Read 45.7 4K Write 111 4K Mixed 59.8 205% 72.3 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 344 DQ Mixed 358 270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 124%
Udisk 2.0 2GB 30 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 2GB free, PID 3234 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 3.6 3.5 3.6 3.4 3.6 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	4.37% Terrible	Read 17.2 Write 2.7 Mixed 5.5 SusWrite 3.5 8% 7.23 MB/s	4K Read 4.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 17% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.37% Great: 4%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$75 134,977 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2800 MHz Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	83.2% Excellent	MC Read 32.2 MC Write 32.1 MC Mixed 22.3 82% 28.9 GB/s	SC Read 18.2 SC Write 36.8 SC Mixed 26.7 78% 27.2 GB/s	Latency 58.2 69% 58.2 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 83.2% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING B460-PLUS Builds (Compare 2,619 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 88%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 80%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B460-PLUS - $140

CPU
Core i5-10400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 153,026 samples	853x
Core i5-10400Intel $125Bench 84%, 71,804 samples	298x
Core i5-10600KIntel $144Bench 92%, 70,951 samples	241x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $283Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	257x
RTX 2060Nvidia $291Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	211x
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	203x

SSD
Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBWD $68Bench 204%, 97,624 samples	61x
Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBWD $74Bench 228%, 180,890 samples	56x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	56x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	152x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	137x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	76x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $664

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16