Gigabyte GA-C621-WD12-IPMI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics97.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive214% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-C621-WD12-IPMI  (all builds)
Memory27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200721
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '22 at 20:17
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Bronze 3204
CPU0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
53% Above average
Memory 61.8
1-Core 56.7
2-Core 118
47% 78.9 Pts
4-Core 238
8-Core 478
42% 358 Pts
64-Core 703
44% 703 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 53%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-12GB
Asus(1043 886D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 497.09
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
97.2% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 108
Parallax 123
101% 118 fps
MRender 131
Gravity 113
Splatting 94.8
90% 113 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 102%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte Aorus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$80
825GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM13.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1491 1521 1560 1486 987 864 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
214% Outstanding
Read 1390
Write 1,528
Mixed 1,632
SusWrite 1,318
332% 1,467 MB/s
4K Read 35.6
4K Write 86.7
4K Mixed 53.4
168% 58.6 MB/s
DQ Read 657
DQ Write 472
DQ Mixed 564
422% 564 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 214%
Great: 491%
Intel SSDSC2BX200G4 200GB
162GB free
Firmware: G2010160
SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 222 223 216 217 215 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 320
Write 188
Mixed 203
SusWrite 218
52% 232 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 72.3
4K Mixed 29.3
121% 43.8 MB/s
DQ Read 334
DQ Write 164
DQ Mixed 234
178% 244 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 85%
WD Gold 1TB (2016)-$85
894GB free
Firmware: RR09
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 190 191 197 191 195 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 159
Write 211
Mixed 108
SusWrite 194
123% 168 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 1
400% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 102%
Great: 109%
Amd-raid WDC WD6003FRYZ-0 6TB
5TB free
Firmware: 01.01H01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 257 241 252 242 239 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Read 218
Write 211
Mixed 107
SusWrite 247
143% 196 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 1.6
351% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 134%
Great: 140%
USB DISK 2.0 16GB
14GB free, PID 3e00
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 5.7 7.3 6.8 6.9 5.6 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
6.01% Terrible
Read 16.2
Write 10.5
Mixed 10.3
SusWrite 6.4
14% 10.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.8
57% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.01%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2K40BB2-CTD 2x16GB
2 of 12 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.6% Below average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 13.4
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 6.4
20% 7 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-C621-WD12-IPMI Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-C621-WD12-IPMI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 147% - Outstanding Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback