bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Memory125GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 125GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory65.3 GB free of 125 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191217
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '22 at 14:29
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: AMD EPYC 7302 16-Core
None, 2 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.3% Above average
Memory 43.6
1-Core 96.4
2-Core 190
58% 110 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 602
60% 486 Pts
64-Core 1621
100% 1621 Pts
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft virtueller Datenträger 1TB
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 1,399
Write 1,281
Mixed 1,584
318% 1,421 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 18
4K Mixed 15.9
56% 17.1 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 148
112% 149 MB/s
Microsoft virtueller Datenträger 1TB
616GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 1,310
Write 1,215
Mixed 1,448
296% 1,324 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 18.3
4K Mixed 16.2
56% 17.1 MB/s
DQ Read 193
DQ Write 178
DQ Mixed 69.3
84% 147 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Microsoft Corporation None Corporation None Corporation None Corporation None 68GB
0, 0, 0, 0 MHz
3968, 32767, 896, 32767 MB
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
74% Very good
MC Read 25.7
MC Write 30.5
MC Mixed 31.3
83% 29.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 17.1
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 186
22% 186 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 74%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,432 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback