MSI MS-7513

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive24.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardMSI MS-7513  (all builds)
Memory2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080516
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '22 at 11:18
Run Duration381 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9450-$110
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
49.8% Average
Memory 73.5
1-Core 38.8
2-Core 77.4
42% 63.2 Pts
4-Core 154
8-Core 154
21% 154 Pts
64-Core 154
10% 154 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Asus(1043 83FB) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 300 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.89% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 0.7
2% 1.93 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 2.1
2% 2.4 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.89%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS350 256GB
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AP613PE0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 209 119 125 163 101 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24.1% Poor
Read 89.2
Write 63.2
Mixed 60.7
SusWrite 153
21% 91.5 MB/s
4K Read 12.9
4K Write 15.1
4K Mixed 6.7
36% 11.6 MB/s
DQ Read 11
DQ Write 15.5
DQ Mixed 13.1
10% 13.2 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 100%
WD WD7500AYYS-01RCA0 750GB
695GB free
Firmware: 30.04G30
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 90 90 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Write 33.9
Mixed 24.6
SusWrite 89.7
36% 49.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 25% Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
21.4% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 6.2
MC Mixed 6.3
19% 6.73 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 6.8
18% 6.37 GB/s
Latency 93.6
43% 93.6 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-7513 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-7513

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $110
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback