MSI H410M PRO-VH (MS-7C89)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics0.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C89
MotherboardMSI H410M PRO-VH (MS-7C89)  (all builds)
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201015
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '22 at 09:39
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Gold G6400
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
74.1% Very good
Memory 90.9
1-Core 108
2-Core 200
77% 133 Pts
4-Core 333
8-Core 330
44% 332 Pts
64-Core 338
21% 338 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 610
MSI(1462 7C89) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1121
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.74% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 3.9
0% 2.2 fps
MRender 5.2
Gravity 3.2
Splatting 0.1
2% 2.83 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 0.74%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
V-gen10as20ar128sdk 128GB 128GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0200Sf10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 19 33 17 24 26 MB/s
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.4% Average
Read 58.3
Write 207
Mixed 73
SusWrite 41.6
22% 95 MB/s
4K Read 35.6
4K Write 89
4K Mixed 9
113% 44.5 MB/s
DQ Read 151
DQ Write 219
DQ Mixed 17.5
60% 129 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 64%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
765GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 190 191 191 193 191 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 192
Write 185
Mixed 106
SusWrite 191
124% 168 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
236% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 110%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown D4S4GL24A16 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
39.6% Below average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 10.6
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 11
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 65.9
61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H410M PRO-VH (MS-7C89) Builds (Compare 1,127 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI H410M PRO-VH (MS-7C89)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $126
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback