Galaxy GALAX B460M FANTAXY

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics60.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGalaxy GALAX B460M FANTAXY  (all builds)
MotherboardGALAX GALAX B460M FANTAXY
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200528
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '22 at 08:51
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400F-$98
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Memory 91.7
1-Core 120
2-Core 237
85% 149 Pts
4-Core 446
8-Core 644
68% 545 Pts
64-Core 731
45% 731 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
Device(7377 2000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
60.7% Good
Lighting 78.9
Reflection 77.8
Parallax 75.6
64% 77.4 fps
MRender 64.2
Gravity 74.9
Splatting 60.1
54% 66.4 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$20
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900KB3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 421
Write 417
Mixed 352
88% 397 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 87.7
4K Mixed 37
143% 52.3 MB/s
DQ Read 133
DQ Write 302
DQ Mixed 135
126% 190 MB/s
Poor: 43% Great: 91%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
450GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 174 176 175 177 176 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 171
Mixed 89.2
SusWrite 174
113% 155 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.2
247% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 103%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GBF1X08LFHH35-12-K 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
84.3% Excellent
MC Read 33.2
MC Write 32.9
MC Mixed 23.8
86% 30 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 37.5
SC Mixed 22.1
72% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 64.6
62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GALAX B460M FANTAXY Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

System: Galaxy GALAX B460M FANTAXY

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $418
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback