Asus P8H61-M LX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics36.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8H61-M LX  (all builds)
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110831
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 16 '17 at 11:27
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Memory 91.5
1-Core 89.8
2-Core 175
71% 119 Pts
4-Core 345
8-Core 350
46% 348 Pts
64-Core 350
22% 350 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.9.1
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Lighting 47.7
Reflection 31.9
Parallax 61.1
39% 46.9 fps
MRender 30.8
Gravity 46.7
Splatting 39.6
32% 39 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
164GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
66.2% Good
Read 268
Write 212
Mixed 218
52% 232 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 43.8
4K Mixed 33.5
112% 35.8 MB/s
DQ Read 201
DQ Write 150
DQ Mixed 82.4
87% 145 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
351GB free
Firmware: CC38 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 106
Write 103
Mixed 94.4
76% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.67
4K Write 1.52
4K Mixed 0.62
125% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 70%
WD Elements 1.5TB
103GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Read 30.6
Write 25.5
Mixed 22.9
33% 26.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 1.09
4K Mixed 0.31
50% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-444.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
50.7% Above average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 16.1
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 14.9
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 65
62% 65 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61-M LX Builds (Compare 1,426 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $77
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback