TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP Laptop 15-bs0xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.49% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive41.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Laptop 15-bs0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8328
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190304
Uptime27.2 Days
Run DateFeb 06 '22 at 17:35
Run Duration272 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6006U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Memory 80.5
1-Core 61
2-Core 112
53% 84.7 Pts
4-Core 166
8-Core 169
22% 168 Pts
64-Core 166
10% 166 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑
This bench: 54.4%
 Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
HP(103C 8328) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7925
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
5.49% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 0.2
6% 3.27 fps
MRender 5.1
Gravity 5.1
Splatting 8.6
5% 6.27 fps
Poor: 3% ↑
This bench: 5.49%
 Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SN8U-128G-1006 128GB
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4120006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 97 93 89 84 95 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
41.9% Average
Read 296
Write 176
Mixed 147
SusWrite 95.5
40% 179 MB/s
4K Read 8.6
4K Write 16.3
4K Mixed 14.5
40% 13.1 MB/s
DQ Read 316
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 161
145% 224 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑
This bench: 41.9%
 Great: 89%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47
774GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 96 96 99 105 105 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 101
Write 98.3
Mixed 54.1
SusWrite 99.6
65% 88.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑
This bench: 57.6%
 Great: 62%
Corsair Flash Voyager 8GB
2GB free, PID 0ad0
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.9 8 7.9 8 8.1 8.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
6.01% Terrible
Read 22.6
Write 7.5
Mixed 9
SusWrite 8
14% 11.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
19% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑
This bench: 6.01%
 Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
37.7% Below average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 10.7
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 13.5
SC Mixed 11.8
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 79.6
50% 79.6 ns
Poor: 23% ↑
This bench: 37.7%
 Great: 43%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Laptop 15-bs0xx Builds (Compare 3,737 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15-bs0xx

CPU
Core i5-7200UIntelBench 45%, 205,332 samples1,153x
Core i3-6006UIntelBench 36%, 47,111 samples957x
Core i7-7500UIntelBench 48%, 139,101 samples609x
GPU
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples2,336x
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples944x
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 60,712 samples388x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples116x
A400 480GBKingston  $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples78x
SD8SN8U-128G-1006 128GBSandiskBench 66%, 10,347 samples53x
RAM
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples376x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples352x
M471A1K43BB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 42,779 samples183x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback