Acer Veriton L6610G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics0.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Veriton L6610G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Veriton L6610G
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20110809
Uptime8.2 Days
Run DateFeb 06 '22 at 16:47
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400S-$70
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
68% Good
Memory 90.9
1-Core 81
2-Core 148
65% 107 Pts
4-Core 265
8-Core 256
35% 261 Pts
64-Core 268
17% 268 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 68%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
Acer(1025 0494) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.85% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 0.7
1% 1.03 fps
MRender 1.6
Gravity 0.6
Splatting 1.2
1% 1.13 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.85%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z22000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 333 341 335 350 339 346 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
69.9% Good
Read 427
Write 332
Mixed 244
SusWrite 341
75% 336 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 49.7
4K Mixed 12.8
75% 28 MB/s
DQ Read 178
DQ Write 280
DQ Mixed 86.6
106% 182 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 86%
TOSHIBA MQ01ACF050 500GB
464GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 24 25 24 25 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Read 27.3
Write 19.2
Mixed 19
SusWrite 24.4
30% 22.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
98% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 M471B5273DH0-CH9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
52.1% Above average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 16.5
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 16.5
44% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 66
61% 66 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Veriton L6610G Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Veriton L6610G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback