Lenovo 20150

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20150  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Product Name
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130314
Uptime5.7 Days
Run DateFeb 06 '22 at 11:10
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3320M-$199
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
49.2% Average
Memory 73.2
1-Core 58.8
2-Core 108
50% 79.9 Pts
4-Core 146
8-Core 159
20% 152 Pts
64-Core 166
10% 166 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3902) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
1.99% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 1.8
2% 2.3 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 1.6
Splatting 2.8
2% 2.5 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.99%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Goodram CX100 240GB
147GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM11.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 72 73 72 91 72 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Read 348
Write 362
Mixed 87.4
SusWrite 87.7
49% 221 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 31.2
4K Mixed 16.4
63% 21.6 MB/s
DQ Read 317
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 43.5
107% 224 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
53.7% Above average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 17.6
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 14.5
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 94.1
42% 94.1 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20150 Builds (Compare 834 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $128
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback