Asrock P65iCafe

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics8.64% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive22.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock P65iCafe  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1862 x 1048 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120723
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateFeb 06 '22 at 10:32
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1270 V2
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Memory 81.9
1-Core 104
2-Core 194
73% 126 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 508
52% 423 Pts
64-Core 517
32% 517 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Gigabyte(1458 3553) 1GB
CLim: 1110 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
8.64% Terrible
Lighting 9.6
Reflection 12.8
Parallax 12.4
8% 11.6 fps
MRender 14.3
Gravity 12.5
Splatting 11.3
10% 12.7 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.64%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
3 256GB SSD 256GB
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW200326
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.4 3.1 24 18 286 295 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
22.7% Poor
Read 300
Write 123
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 105
29% 133 MB/s
4K Read 10.1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.1
16% 3.93 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 8GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.8% Poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 7
21% 7.2 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 7.2
22% 7.73 GB/s
Latency 77.1
52% 77.1 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P65iCafe Builds (Compare 38 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock P65iCafe

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $390
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback