Besstar X400

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics14.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive145% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemBesstar X400  (all builds)
MotherboardBESSTAR Default string
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210310
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateFeb 06 '22 at 05:19
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G Graphics
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Memory 75.3
1-Core 140
2-Core 257
86% 158 Pts
4-Core 503
8-Core 738
77% 621 Pts
64-Core 736
46% 736 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
AMD(1002 1636) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.30.23.01
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Lighting 17.2
Reflection 18.5
Parallax 23.2
14% 19.6 fps
MRender 14.7
Gravity 17.6
Splatting 19.4
14% 17.2 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PDP3512B-A01 512GB
154GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFK0S03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 285 284 289 292 292 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
145% Outstanding
Read 1,044
Write 362
Mixed 452
SusWrite 288
118% 536 MB/s
4K Read 42.3
4K Write 154
4K Mixed 52.2
213% 83 MB/s
DQ Read 569
DQ Write 359
DQ Mixed 417
324% 448 MB/s
Poor: 120%
This bench: 145%
Great: 222%
WD Elements 2621 2TB
8GB free, PID 2621
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 52 55 57 57 61 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 115
Write 97.2
Mixed 69.8
SusWrite 64.2
112% 86.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 8.8
4K Mixed 0.7
325% 3.37 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 10
DQ Mixed 0.5
359% 3.63 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston CBD32D4S2S1ME-8 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
75.5% Very good
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 23.7
MC Mixed 27.9
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 31.2
SC Mixed 24.9
75% 26.2 GB/s
Latency 89.7
45% 89.7 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X400 Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Besstar X400

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback