Dell Precision 7720

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics47.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive92.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDell Precision 7720  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0FD48R
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170614
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 16 '17 at 04:22
Run Duration83 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1545M v5
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Memory 93.4
1-Core 107
2-Core 214
80% 138 Pts
4-Core 394
8-Core 603
62% 498 Pts
64-Core 602
37% 602 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P5000-M (Mobile)
Dell(1028 07B1) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 22.21.13.8541
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.8% Average
Lighting 55.4
Reflection 81.7
Parallax 56.1
45% 64.4 fps
MRender 57.2
Gravity 56.3
Splatting 75.5
53% 63 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 75%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron 1100 256GB
117GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0D
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Read 472
Write 433
Mixed 475
103% 460 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 95.3
4K Mixed 25.2
119% 48.2 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 286
DQ Mixed 46.6
92% 183 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMA81GS7AFR8N-UH 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
120% Outstanding
MC Read 56.5
MC Write 54.9
MC Mixed 26.3
131% 45.9 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 38.3
SC Mixed 20.4
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 61.3
65% 61.3 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 120%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision 7720 Builds (Compare 1,422 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Precision 7720

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $33
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback