Lenovo 4236CM5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 4236CM5  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 4236CM5
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110707
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 05 '22 at 23:41
Run Duration218 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 68%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2520M-$34
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
44.7% Average
Memory 79.5
1-Core 31.9
2-Core 52.7
40% 54.7 Pts
4-Core 57.6
8-Core 88.9
9% 73.2 Pts
64-Core 73.6
5% 73.6 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Legend(17AA 21CE) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.84% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 1.7
2% 2.2 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 1.3
Splatting 2.8
2% 2.3 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.84%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS725032A7E630 320GB-$89
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GHBZB550
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 63 63 68 60 63 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
39% Below average
Read 73.4
Write 80.1
Mixed 15.9
SusWrite 62.3
42% 57.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
122% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 39%
Great: 59%
TDK LoR TF10 8GB
0GB free, PID 0619
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 0.7
Mixed 1.5
2% 1.1 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 Kingston 99U5428-046.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.4% Below average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 14.4
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 8.1
SC Mixed 9.4
25% 8.7 GB/s
Latency 81.5
49% 81.5 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 4236CM5 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Lenovo 4236CM5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $34
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback