MSI MS-1796

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 96% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star GL72 6QD
MotherboardMSI MS-1796  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160603
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 05 '22 at 22:25
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU1%
CPU Throttled 96%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Memory 76.4
1-Core 78.2
2-Core 138
59% 97.6 Pts
4-Core 222
8-Core 298
33% 260 Pts
64-Core 289
18% 289 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Graphics i gfx-driver-ci-master-9938
MSI(1462 1191) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.9999
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
3.63% Terrible
Lighting 5
Reflection 17.3
Parallax 8
4% 10.1 fps
MRender 6.7
Gravity 4.7
Splatting 0.2
3% 3.87 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.63%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG5 256GB
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM01.R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 289 213 222 213 239 140 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Read 455
Write 314
Mixed 299
SusWrite 219
72% 322 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 61.4
4K Mixed 31.7
114% 40 MB/s
DQ Read 247
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 5.7
55% 131 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMSO8GX4M1A2133C15 Samsung M471A1K43BB0-CPB 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
69.6% Good
MC Read 26.6
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 20.3
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 28.8
SC Mixed 21.3
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 87.4
46% 87.4 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-1796 Builds (Compare 160 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-1796

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback