TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics117% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200401
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateFeb 05 '22 at 22:11
Run Duration198 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Memory 88.7
1-Core 145
2-Core 288
95% 174 Pts
4-Core 551
8-Core 976
92% 764 Pts
64-Core 1,423
88% 1,423 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑
This bench: 95.7%
 Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
Gigabyte(1458 3FF4)
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
117% Outstanding
Lighting 153
Reflection 154
Parallax 146
125% 151 fps
MRender 176
Gravity 139
Splatting 120
116% 145 fps
Poor: 116% ↑
This bench: 117%
 Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
131GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,649
Write 2,567
Mixed 1,992
535% 2,403 MB/s
4K Read 67.9
4K Write 183
4K Mixed 96.8
324% 116 MB/s
DQ Read 1,212
DQ Write 999
DQ Mixed 1,065
808% 1,092 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 410%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$40
85GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 107 110 114 114 110 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 66.9
Write 92.7
Mixed 63.4
SusWrite 108
61% 82.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.3
106% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑
This bench: 50.1%
 Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
89% Excellent
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 34.6
89% 31.2 GB/s
SC Read 27.4
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 35.9
86% 30 GB/s
Latency 68.8
58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 66% ↑
This bench: 89%
 Great: 118%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING Builds (Compare 8,248 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING - $460

CPU
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD  $260Bench 99%, 60,132 samples1,930x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD  $180Bench 98%, 128,080 samples1,346x
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD  $375Bench 88%, 197,342 samples1,117x
GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia  $700Bench 187%, 424,051 samples1,112x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia  $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples881x
RTX 3090Nvidia  $1,198Bench 210%, 158,856 samples615x
SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $105Bench 394%, 276,089 samples853x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples712x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples423x
RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples435x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair  $120Bench 89%, 144,399 samples189x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x16GBG.SKILLBench 110%, 12,538 samples157x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $1,525
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback