Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 22% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	27.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual-Core TK-42 103 User benchmarks, average bench 30% Socket S1G1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	30% Below average	Memory 52.8 1-Core 23 2-Core 45 28% 40.3 Pts	4-Core 45.1 8-Core 45 6% 45 Pts	64-Core 45.5 3% 45.5 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 30% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 3200 5,730 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 028D) 256MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	0.68% Terrible	Lighting 1 Reflection 0.7 Parallax 0.6 1% 0.77 fps	MRender 0.5 Gravity 0.7 Splatting 0.4 0% 0.53 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.68% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TE256HMHP-000L7 256GB 4,594 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 219GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT09L6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 100 78 83 92 68 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	27.6% Poor	Read 117 Write 88.7 Mixed 101 SusWrite 87.1 22% 98.5 MB/s	4K Read 10.8 4K Write 18.6 4K Mixed 14 44% 14.5 MB/s	DQ Read 87.2 DQ Write 78.6 DQ Mixed 50.6 47% 72.1 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 27.6% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya NT2GT64U8HD0BN-AD NT1GT64UH8D0FN-AD 3GB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 400, 400 MHz 2048, 1024 MB Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	12.6% Very poor	MC Read 4 MC Write 3.8 MC Mixed 3.9 11% 3.9 GB/s	SC Read 3.7 SC Write 3.7 SC Mixed 3.9 11% 3.77 GB/s	Latency 151 26% 151 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 12.6% Great: 15%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 1%

Tree trunk

Desktop 23%

Surfboard

Workstation 1%

Tree trunk

CPU
Athlon 64 X2 Dual-Core TK-42AMDBench 30%, 103 samples	6x
Athlon TF-20AMDBench 28%, 408 samples	3x
Turion 64 X2 Mobile Technology TL-60AMD $28Bench 33%, 1,111 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 3200ATIBench 1%, 5,730 samples	10x

RAM
HYMP125S64CP8-S6 HYMP112S64CP6-S6 3GBUnknownBench 12%, 13 samples	2x
M4 70T5663QZ3-CF7 2x2GBSamsungBench 18%, 345 samples	1x
M4 70T5663EH3-CF7 M4 70T2864QZ3-CE6 3GBSamsungBench 12%, 26 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16