bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
System
MotherboardIntel DH67BL
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181023
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 05 '22 at 13:03
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
62.1% Good
Memory 79
1-Core 78.2
2-Core 168
63% 108 Pts
4-Core 244
8-Core 460
42% 352 Pts
64-Core 459
28% 459 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Desktop V2 1.35 GHz)-$15
Intel(8086 2002) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.94% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 1.7
2% 2.23 fps
MRender 3.2
Gravity 1.4
Splatting 2.9
2% 2.5 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.94%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAK256MAY-1AH12ABHA 256GB
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M5T4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 335 166 151 152 130 146 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
78.9% Very good
Read 418
Write 400
Mixed 307
SusWrite 180
73% 326 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 68.9
4K Mixed 33.3
114% 41.7 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 233
208% 314 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 105%
UDISK PDU01_8G 96I2.0 8GB
7GB free, PID 0165
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 4.9 4.8 4.6 4.7 4.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
4.05% Terrible
Read 15.3
Write 3
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 4.6
7% 6.85 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
13% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.05%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
44.2% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 14
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 11.8
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 82.3
49% 82.3 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,495 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback