MSI A58M-E35 (MS-7721)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics98.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7721
MotherboardMSI A58M-E35 (MS-7721)  (all builds)
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 05 '22 at 06:30
Run Duration525 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 51%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5600K APU-$250
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
42.8% Average
Memory 61.3
1-Core 66.1
2-Core 110
48% 79 Pts
4-Core 136
8-Core 179
20% 157 Pts
64-Core 145
9% 145 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 368.25
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98.6% Outstanding
Lighting 119
Reflection 126
Parallax 144
97% 130 fps
MRender 117
Gravity 136
Splatting 120
102% 125 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK1255GSX H 120GB
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FG001Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.7 8.2 20 21 24 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
5.73% Terrible
Read 1.8
Write 4.5
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 18.2
5% 6.75 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
13% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 5.73%
Great: 41%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 32GB
24GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 20 19 19 19 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Read 29
Write 18.4
Mixed 19.7
SusWrite 18.7
28% 21.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
101% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
31.2% Below average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 11.8
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 8.8
21% 7.2 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A58M-E35 (MS-7721) Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI A58M-E35 (MS-7721)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $188
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback