HP 120-1024la

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemHP 120-1024la  (all builds)
MotherboardQuanta 2AC5
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110726
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 05 '22 at 05:17
Run Duration106 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2405S
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
67.2% Good
Memory 90.1
1-Core 65.5
2-Core 131
60% 95.4 Pts
4-Core 259
8-Core 259
35% 259 Pts
64-Core 257
16% 257 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Desktop V1 1.1 GHz)
HP(103C 2AC5) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
1.65% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 1.6
2% 1.97 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 1.7
Splatting 2.4
2% 2.27 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.65%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$70
764GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP4O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 119 110 123 110 121 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Read 131
Write 43.3
Mixed 64
SusWrite 117
65% 88.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 Kingston 9905469-144.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
48.8% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 15.8
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 12.2
SC Mixed 13.3
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 67
60% 67 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 120-1024la Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: HP 120-1024la

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $49
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback